State Report

Texas Federal Spending — Week of 2026-10-25

2026-10-25 – 2026-10-31
Total Obligated
$244k
Awards
2
Contractors
2
Agencies
1

Federal Spending Report: Texas (October 25-31, 2026)

The Department of Agriculture distributed $244,000 across Texas during the final week of October, supporting two Habitat for Humanity affiliates through grant funding. The modest spending total reflects a concentrated week of activity focused on affordable housing initiatives in the state.

Two organizations split the week's federal allocations equally. Habitat for Humanity of Smith County received $122,000, while Waco Habitat for Humanity, Inc. secured an identical $122,000 grant. Both awards came from the Department of Agriculture, underscoring the federal government's continued investment in housing development through agricultural department channels—a mechanism often used to support rural and community development projects alongside traditional housing agencies.

The spending activity involved minimal administrative overhead, with just two unique contractors receiving funds during this seven-day period. This concentration suggests either a targeted funding initiative or the tail end of a larger appropriations cycle focused specifically on Habitat for Humanity's mission across Texas communities.

The Department of Agriculture was the sole federal agency active in Texas during this reporting window, accounting for 100 percent of the $244,000 obligated. This single-agency pattern is noteworthy for its simplicity, indicating coordinated funding efforts rather than fragmented spending across multiple departments.

All funding took the form of grants rather than contracts or other agreement types, reflecting the charitable and community-development nature of the recipient organizations. Habitat for Humanity's dual awards across different Texas regions—Smith County in the eastern part of the state and Waco in central Texas—suggest a statewide approach to supporting affordable housing construction and rehabilitation efforts. The equal distribution to both organizations indicates deliberate parity in funding allocation rather than competitive differentiation.

Largest Awards

Department of Agriculture
$122k
Department of Agriculture
$122k