Federal Spending Report — 2026-06-25
U.S. Federal Spending Report: June 25, 2026
The Department of Agriculture obligated $132,000 across four awards on June 25, 2026, with the majority of funds flowing to a single North Carolina-based partnership. The day's spending activity involved two unique contractors and remained concentrated within a single federal agency.
Roberts Landing Limited Partnership secured the largest award of the day at $91,000 through a direct payment from the Department of Agriculture, accounting for nearly 69 percent of total obligated funds. The remaining $41,000 was distributed through three separate grants, with specific recipient information redacted due to privacy considerations. Two of these grants, each valued at $11,000, went to recipients in Michigan, while a $19,000 grant was allocated to a North Carolina-based entity.
The spending pattern reveals a notable geographic concentration, with North Carolina receiving $110,000 across two awards—83 percent of the day's total obligations. Michigan captured the remaining $22,000 through two grant awards. This regional distribution suggests the Department of Agriculture's agricultural support efforts on this date were heavily weighted toward North Carolina operations.
Roberts Landing Limited Partnership emerged as the dominant contractor, claiming a single large direct payment award. A second contractor, whose identity is redacted, received three separate grant awards totaling $41,000, demonstrating a more distributed funding approach through the grant mechanism. The contrast between the direct payment structure used for Roberts Landing and the grant-based approach for other recipients reflects different program mechanisms within the Department of Agriculture's funding portfolio.
The Department of Agriculture's singular control over all four awards underscores the concentrated nature of this day's federal spending activity. With no inter-agency distribution, all obligated funds remained within the department's various agricultural programs and initiatives. The three-to-one ratio of grants to direct payments suggests the department's preference for grant-based distribution mechanisms on this particular date, though the larger dollar value associated with direct payment awards indicates their significance in the spending portfolio.